The forced response of , , built from the fundamental matrix and the state transition matrix.
Is the Conserved Quantity Still Conserved?
- For the homogeneous response, for all , and we showed is in fact invertible
- i.e. when
- For the non-homogeneous response (), look at
- When :
- Using the derivative of the inverse, :
Derivation
- Integrate both sides:
- So
- so that
General Solution of the State Equation
- : “zero input” response (due only to )
- : “zero (initial) state” response (due only to )
Output Response
- Similar decomposition for the output:
Impulse Response Matrix
- Equivalently
- : “impulse response matrix”
Impulse Response Matrix
- where is the “delta function” (unit impulse), which has the property that for any function ,
- For LTI systems this becomes , the inverse Laplace transform of the transfer function matrix
Interpretation: Time-Varying Coefficients
- Rewrite the general state solution as
- or
- (the “conserved” now evolves, driven by the input)
- Note
- Check:
LTI Systems
- For LTI systems:
- Note: since the STM for LTI depends only on the elapsed time, , we can w.l.o.g. assume . So
LTI Solution
- [Note: is calculated by replacing "" in the expansion of with "", i.e. scalars ]
- So how do we explicitly expand ? See Common Matrix Exponentials and the Laplace approach