Re-expressing the state in a new basis, (or ), generalizing the modal form: internal details change, input/output behavior does not.
Constant Transformations
- Note: there is nothing special about the eigenvector matrix in the modal approach! We can do this with an arbitrary, nonsingular (any nonsingular matrix defines a basis), i.e.
- with
Time-Varying Transformations
- This holds for a time-varying basis as well, i.e. linearly independent at each
- Let and
- Then
- where now
- The above is the most general form for a coordinate transformation
- Note: if is in fact constant, then , and these eq’ns collapse to the previous versions,
- Also note, nothing changes here if , etc. are themselves time-varying, i.e.
General Coordinate Transformation
- Thus, the coordinate change game can be played equally well with LTI/LTV systems, and constant or time-varying basis vectors for the new coordinates
- Time-varying can even turn any into a constant matrix: see Lyapunov Transformations
Input/Output Behavior Is Unchanged
- Summary:
- , , ,
- Block diagram: [system ( or )]
- are the same in both models
- the I/O behavior of the system is the same regardless of the coordinates used for the states
Invariance of the Fundamental Matrix
- Claim: let be any fundamental matrix for the eq’ns, and similarly for . Then
- Pf: , where each satisfies the homogeneous dynamics for
- But any solution for can be written as with nonsingular
- So for some
Invariance of the State Transition Matrix
STM Under a Coordinate Change
- Claim:
- Pf:
Invariance of the Impulse Response and TFM
- Claim: the impulse response matrix is the same:
- Pf:
- For LTI, this implies the TFM is invariant:
- Directly: , with (LTI) :
Other Useful Transformations for LTI
- Modal form (): decoupled
- Block modal form: real coordinates for complex eigenvalues
- Jordan normal form: repeated eigenvalues